What do you feel is wrong with the current system?
+2
Icraig33
Void22
6 posters
Don't get too accustomed to the current champion classification
Void22- Posts : 30
Join date : 2013-02-12
Icraig33- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2013-02-10
Age : 28
Location : Canada
at the moment, it doesn't properly classify champion roles, due to how many viable roles many champions have. Pure hybrid champs are the worst off. I guess the crafter can simply post in the forum he/she feels the champion excels the most in, but atm I feel as though those people feel shafted by this current system. I want to have an easier, more universal way of classifying them.
Of course, if you people think that the current system is fine, I'll think about leaving it as is.
Of course, if you people think that the current system is fine, I'll think about leaving it as is.
Void22- Posts : 30
Join date : 2013-02-12
I think that for now, you should simply focus on adding descriptions for the current roles as they seem pretty thorough. If people say that its to constricting then you can change it.
Icraig33- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2013-02-10
Age : 28
Location : Canada
I actually had that exact idea. That has been implemented in the meantime, and I'll see what most people think of this change
Flames of Terror- Posts : 69
Join date : 2013-02-14
Location : Balbol Citadel
Here is my opinion on it.
--------
Concepts are usually created with a "Primary" role in mind, this is true for even hybrids. Now while many concepts have "Secondary" roles these are just things they can do fairly well in addition to their main purpose. Truthfully I think Riot needs to stop making ambiguous champions as it is corrupting the play styles of games (IE Darius). People who complain about their champion having multiple roles will just need to be informed that a concept has 1 main way of playing and should be placed within said sub-forum.
As for explaining the Roles requirements I'm sure Bliztron wouldn't mind posting his information here.
--------
Concepts are usually created with a "Primary" role in mind, this is true for even hybrids. Now while many concepts have "Secondary" roles these are just things they can do fairly well in addition to their main purpose. Truthfully I think Riot needs to stop making ambiguous champions as it is corrupting the play styles of games (IE Darius). People who complain about their champion having multiple roles will just need to be informed that a concept has 1 main way of playing and should be placed within said sub-forum.
As for explaining the Roles requirements I'm sure Bliztron wouldn't mind posting his information here.
Bliztron- Posts : 51
Join date : 2013-02-10
Age : 28
Location : United States
I could do that. Actually, I'll post that under guides. If Isaiah allows it I could post it somewhere more important.
Icraig33- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2013-02-10
Age : 28
Location : Canada
Bliztron wrote:I could do that. Actually, I'll post that under guides. If Isaiah allows it I could post it somewhere more important.
You can go ahead and post it as an announcement in the champions category. It'll help people who are wondering where to place their champions
EDIT: apparently not even admins can post a thread in a category. Go ahead and post the role thread in guides, and I'll see if I can get it in the champions category on top of all the sub-forums later
MobytheWhite- Posts : 10
Join date : 2013-02-16
Age : 34
Location : USA
ffs finally
ploki122- Posts : 48
Join date : 2013-02-16
Age : 31
Location : Quebec, Canada
Honestly, the thing I feel would be the best is to simply split the champions by completion... you have a Champion global thread, divided into theorycrafting, draft, tentative and complete. Maybe add tags to "complete" subtopic.
MobytheWhite- Posts : 10
Join date : 2013-02-16
Age : 34
Location : USA
thisploki122 wrote:Honestly, the thing I feel would be the best is to simply split the champions by completion... you have a Champion global thread, divided into theorycrafting, draft, tentative and complete. Maybe add tags to "complete" subtopic.
|
|